Raja Miah on the Corrupt Electoral Relationship Between Labour Elites and the Pakistani Grooming Gangs

This continues the discussion on this blog about the Pakistani grooming gangs and their motives. It’s a video of an interview on the Heretics channel on YouTube between the host, Andrew Gold, and Raja Miah, a former counterterrorism officer, who started investigating the grooming gangs. In doing so he claims to have discovered that the leaders of the gangs were, or were connected to, the leaders of the Muslim communities in their areas and that these leaders were active drumming up votes for the Labour party. Hence their immunity from prosecution by the authorities.

I realise that many readers of this blog don’t share my opinions on the gangs, and two of the great commenters here posted their objections to my last video on the subject, in which I stated that the gangs were aided by an institutional anti-White racism. I’m still very much of that opinion, as the victims stated that they were racially as well as sexually abused by their molesters. One of the female Muslim councillors stated that these crimes were racially motivated because she came from a Muslim home that had the same negative views of white women and girls: that they were, essentially, promiscuous whores who deserved no better. I strongly believe that multiculturalism is failing as the anti-racist institutions were set up to protect – rightly – ethnic minorities from racism but fail to recognise it when it is directed against Whites.

I am not, however, blind to the fact that sexual abuse it not by any means confined to Pakistani Muslims. Neither are the ‘Patriots’ who vlog about this. One of them put up the statistics for the many tens of thousands of unsolved cases of sexual abuse in this country. Several of my relatives and friends work in the care sector, and they’ve told me about the instances they’ve encountered where they or the police have reported cases to social workers because of fears that someone was in danger, only to have the social workers handed back to them. While I was in hospital this week I spoke to a former teacher, who had taught in Tower Hamlets. She stated that teachers there had reported various cases to social services, but they were so overworked they didn’t get round to investigating them, or took years to do so. And yes, there have been cases where individuals were protected because of their political connections.

One of these was that of Mark Trotter in the 1980s. Lambeth or Brent council, according to Private Eye, were desperately searching for the 200 or so boys Trotter had raped and abused when working as a social worker before dying of AIDS. Despite being a paedophile, Trotter was a very active member of the Labour party and gay rights group, and so was protected from prosecution by his comrades. If Miah is to be believed, the Pakistani Muslim gangs were similarly protected because of their connections to the authorities.

The Interview

MIah begins the interview by saying that he has been researching the grooming gangs for six years, after a twenty year career in counterterrorism. He had left this job as his relationship with his partner had broken down and he wanted to have as close a relationship as possible to his daughter to show that she actually had a father. He stated that he believed that his finding of people who looked like himself becoming increasingly sectarian and hating Britain was due to the failure of multiculturalism. He started investigating the grooming gangs after a friend contacted him to say that the leader of her local mosque was a convicted sex offender and was afraid for her children’s safety. He got in touch with the local authority’s dedicated officer for these cases, only to be bluntly told, ‘We know, the police know, we don’t care’ in an email. The chairman of the local Bangladeshi community carried the Muslim block vote and the community’s leaders were members of the local Labour party, and used public funds to build their mosque. He stated that everything he said is documented and in the public domain, a statement he regularly repeated throughout the interview. He thus campaigned against the local Muslim leader, forcing him to resign. The leader then retaliated by sending his thugs to assault Miah. The Muslim leader was also a a candidate for the Labour party, paired with Secretary of State Jim MacMahon at the general election.

The Telegraph noticed that there was a surge in postal voting against Farage in one mosque. Miah states that this abuse of the postal vote takes place across the country and that the Labour leadership know this. Miah stated that he would like to reform the legislation regulating the postal vote because of electoral fraud. Islamist gangsters have infiltrated the Labour party. There is a relationship developing between the British Left and the Islamists similar to that in Lebanon and Gaza, where the Islamist initially were aided by the left before turning on them. British Muslims are now wondering if they need the left’s help in campaigning for Gaza. An example of this is they way they turned on Jess Philips. And all this is bound up with the exploitation of the voting system. Young Muslims increasingly see Brits as the enemy, and the grooming gangs exploited people they see as inferior or vulnerable, like White working class girls. But these girls are also let down by the White middle class elites who saw their abuse as the price of staying in power. This horrifies Muslims like Miah, but their voices are fewer than those of the exploiters as the Islamists come for you if you speak out.

New public records show that the grooming gangs are real, and that these gangs are all connected through family connections, as Kemi Badenoch admitted when she was secretary of state. And the Islamists delivering the block votes to the Labour party were people like Shabin Ahmed in Rochester. Miah states that a figure in the Oldham establishment contacted him about such figures. They were in and out of Michael Meacher’s office while others were in the local council. A local Lib Dem politico recommended that he get in touch with Warren Bates, a UKIP politician in Angela Rayner’s constituency. Bates was a former miner who had joined five different political parties, but not the Tories. Bates gave a dossier of emails showing that the grooming gangs were operating in Oldham from the BBC. On the list of corrupt politicians were Kevin Fitzpatrick and Jim McMahon, who had made an agreement to cover up the gangs for fear of upsetting community relations, using the terrible murder of soldier Lee Rigby as a distraction.

Miah fought back by standing as an Independent at the local election. He was threatened with libel action by Labour. He was shown an additional series of emails by Hughie McDonald, who had blown the whistle on the gangs to the local Children’s Safeguarding Service, for which he had been suspended and sacked from the Labour party. Tony Lloyd was brought in as Police and Crime Commissioner for Rochdale, eventually becoming a Labour MP. He told critics to shut up for fear of losing Muslim votes. Miah knew McDonald through working for the Anglian charity with White working class kids. McDonald was the Chief Magistrate, and got out and show Miah another dossier, which again the press won’t touch. He had asked questions of the local Labour party and had written an article about the matter for Medium, but the online magazine had taken it down. He then began to post pieces on Facebook. He was then contacted by a group of elderly White ladies, who wanted his help about asking questions about this to council members. He gave them the advice they requested. When it came to their turn to ask this question at a council meeting, they were told that time had run out. The meeting was stopped and the councillors were led out, and the police were called to prevent anyone answering the women’s question. The council leader also responded with a barefaced lie. He had contacted respectable people and their lawyers online in an attempt to get them sacked, and launched a smear campaign against Miah.

The next piece of information was about Shabin Ahmed. There was a rumour that he was arranging for people to see children after seeing him. The police missed nine opportunities to arrest him. Miah feels that the police were both controlled and partners in this affair, as Ahmed also sat on the board of the CAB.

The question of White grooming gangs naturally comes up in the discussion. Miah states that these are different from the Muslim grooming gangs and their motivations are different. Miah asks rhetorically how we can stop the buying and selling of our children. He also states that Secretary Fielding launched an internal inquiry to stop the launch of a proper inquiry. It was given to Andy Burnham and Jim McMahon, who were both implicated in the scandal. Burnham commissioned a toothless inquiry, and the police identified 97 men associated with the attacks. But the police and council shut down the operation as the men were politically connected and the minutes of the decision to prosecute the men were lost. This infuriated the campaigner Maggie Oliver. Malcolm Nevison asked of the review for Oldham and Tilton how you could have a review when it is controlled, telling you who you may see by the people being investigated. Those under investigation contacted the witnesses. The review took three years, and hardly interviewed a single survivor. The only one who was, was due to Maggie Oliver. Schools were also removed from the review’s frame of reference, which also referred to Operation Hexagon. This was a joint operation between the police and OLdham council to go after Miah. Miah agreed to testify against the gangs provided the transcript was included. He was then told that they would only take selective notes. One individual, Kaiser Raymond, withdrew from the review claiming that they had lied about his witness. The report claimed Miah had lied and there was no cover up. One of the girls in the review contacted Miah because of the inaccuracies about her in the review. Burnham then launched Operation Sherwood, and the first thing it did was threaten the girl for speaking out.

Miah called for a national inquiry into the grooming gangs and described how he took out Arood Shah, whom he states was affiliated to the gangsters, at the ballot box. Shah was linked to the getaway driver for a cop killer. She came after Miah. The police told him they would have to intervene and put in security measures. However, Jim MacFarlane, one of the few decent cops, left due to political pressure. Arood was leader of Oldham council, but this didn’t stop her car from being blown up. Jim MacMahon told the Daily Mail that Miah had incited such violence, whereas in fact Miah had just written an article about Islamists using the Israel-Palestine conflict to radicalise young Muslims, which was actually published after the explosion. The Mail still published this libellous article but with Miah’s name removed, so readers could still put two and two together and see it was him.

The conversation then moved to questions of how electoral fraud could be combatted. Should Britain make voting compulsory, as was mandatory in some countries, in order to counteract the influence of the mosques? There was also the problem of apathy in local elections, especially in White working class areas where voter turnout was low, and so the Muslim block vote correspondingly more powerful. Miah was afraid that we are losing our country because of the underlying causes behind the gangs and powerful politicians in our country. Miah discussed his grandfather’s patriotism. He served in the Second World War, and was loyal to this country, as were the second generation of British immigrants. The third and fourth generations are much more conservative or Islamic. Miah stated that when they support radical Islamism, they have no idea what they are really buying into and would probably run a mile if they had to live under sharia law. He compares them to the incel culture in attracting young people.

Despite this, Miah was optimistic because of his own triumph over adversity. For three years he had endured such things as dawn raids while he was still in bed, going out lobbying for votes and taking down the councillors connected to the gangs. His opponents had fast tracked a prosecution to prevent him taking down Amanda Cheriton. Debbie Abraham had doctored correspondence between herself and Miah, but he had kept the original. Miah also writes a blog, Red Wall and the Rabble, stating that the Labour Red Wall was kept up by the green monster of Islam.

Miah also concerned that the Palestinian cause was tainted with anti-Semitism, as the activists involved do not criticise other places where Muslims are persecuted, or where Muslims kill non-Muslims. He also discussed the attitudes of the different parties towards growing Muslim political militancy and corruption. The Conservatives, he claimed, don’t understand it, while Labour had entered a partnership with it. This is shown by Starmer’s speech after the Southport murders. This was all about protecting Muslims and was, Miah claimed, a cynical attempt to make Muslims feel under threat and only Labour could protect them. However, the racial dimensions of this relationship was changing. The powerful roles in these communities previously occupied by Whites were now desired by Muslims, who want the big seat. This was all calculated, and Muslim loyalty to Labour was under thread because of the issue of Palestine. Wes Streeting was also trying to ramp up fear in the Muslim community by talking about attacks on Muslims.. But Miah described how Islamists had turned on the Left elsewhere in the world. In Iran they had lynched left-wingers. He also considered Muslim deference to White politicians as a product of a colonial mindset. Labour still feels it can manage Muslims, but the demographics are changing.

When asked who his favourite heretics are, Miah starts with Galileo as the first one he studied in school. His favourite heretic, however, is Salman Rushdie for speaking out against Islamism in the UK He was concerned about the strength of faith of those calling for the death of blasphemers in the UK as well as the definition of islamophobia as he had seen where this had led in other countries. Do we want to live in a society where we cannot criticise certain ideologies or groups? He also reminded his viewers that it was Starmer who had led the vote against the grooming gang inquiry.

If even a tenth of this is correct, then it shows that Labour is utterly corrupt, at least in those areas where the gangs operate, and the White working class is utterly disenfranchised. Labour are now neoliberals, who are as keen as the Tories on privatisation, including that of the NHS, and destroying the welfare state. As I write, Rachel Reeves is planning to start another wave of ‘welfare reform’, although she’s going to be a bit more cautious this time. The commenters have reminded me that Farage has been described as a safety valve for disaffected Tories. True. Others have called him just a Tory Essex man. He also wants to sell off the NHS and destroy the welfare state.

But Labour seems to have compounded all this with a cynical attitude that views the mass rape of White working class girls as an acceptable sacrifice for gaining power. And behind this is the wider view of White middle class liberals afraid and unable to combat ethnic minority racism because of fears they will be called ‘racist’ themselves’ and because of a fixation on White racism that makes them uncomfortable about any other kind.

Obviously not all Muslims approve of the grooming gangs. The Groaniad published a letter condemning them signed by 500 mosques. As for the issue of Palestine, Gold is a fanatical Zionist and has posted hysterical pieces claiming that anyone opposed to Israel is an anti-Semite and prophesying another holocaust. That clearly isn’t the attitude of politicians like Jeremy Corbyn, Labour and Palestine or the Stop the War Coalition. But Starmer’s continued backing of Israel has resulted in disaffected Muslims standing as Independents against Labour, though there have also been attempts to found Muslim parties in Britain in the past. Also, I have heard that the Tories also tried to recruit their own set of ethnic community leaders under Dave Cameron. Many of them were also gangsters, who were subsequently arrested and jailed. As should Cameron. Labour had also faced crises over corruption before, as in the 1970s when many of the local parties had very corrupt relationships with builders and property developers. The party managed to survive that scandal, and they could probably survive this.

But only if the corruption is exposed and the corrupt politicians and police officers thrown out and prosecuted along with the gangs.

Tommy Robinson Claims that His ‘Silenced’ Film Was Funded by Alex Jones

This peculiar story was given to us today by Our Favourite Non-Historian. There’s been the predictable outrage at Robinson getting 18 months in jail. His supporters have been complaining about its injustice while various foreign and Muslims crims have been given much lighter sentences. Like the Muslims who attacked the police at one of the airports a couple of months ago have been bailed and are walking about scot free. Webb states that he expects Robinson to be out in four months’ time because of the issues of overcrowding and so on. He’ll miss Christmas, January and February but should be out following them. This sounds possible, but I’m not sure. Robinson has annoyed too many people with his antics and pretence journalism, and I get the impression that the authorities’ patience has finally snapped.

But the substance of Webb’s video is that Robinson has said through his lawyer, a woman with a formidable history of defending her clients, that the film that got him arrested for contempt, Silenced, was funded by Alex Jones of Infowars notoriety. Jones is the notorious Texan conspiracy theorist who got hit with a billion dollar or so fine for libelling the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre. This was a school shooting that Jones declared was fake, and libelled the grieving parents and family of those murdered as ‘crisis actors’. After years of being insulted by Jones’ gullible viewers online and in real life, the parents sued and got justice. Jones has field for bankruptcy, but has been giving his money to relatives and corporate entities in order to avoid having to pay anything to them. He is still, in reality, immensely rich. What this plea from Robinson means, I don’t know. I don’t know if he hopes that the people who sued him will go after Jones, or if this is a partial attempt to deny responsibility for its content. But if Jones is involved, there might be more to this sorry affair than first appears.

Hope Not Hate Responsible for Misogyny Now a Terrorist Offence

This is another claim History Debunked has made in a recent video. Remember all the fuss there was a few months ago when Labour stated that misogyny was going to be crime under the provisions of their new Hate Crimes bill? There was the usual outcry about Labour clamping down on free speech, and the possibility of men being arrested for telling sexist jokes about women not being able to park and opening doors for ladies. I think the legislation is actually directed at incels of the same type as the maniac a few years ago who killed a woman, small girls and their fathers in Plymouth or somewhere. It may also be a response to the really sick culture of real woman-haters that call genuine women ‘gynoids’ and post videos online of women being beaten up. These misogynists were also in the news a few years ago and were the subject of feminist campaigning. I don’t know how large this culture is. I’d never heard of it, as most people probably haven’t, and there hasn’t been much more about it since. And as far as I know, that vile massacre down in Plymouth was the only one of its kind, and, God willing, the last. The misogyny clause in the Hate Crimes bill won’t lead to ordinary men being arrested for telling Bernard Manning-type jokes.

The clause was attributed to feminists in the Labour party, but according to Webb it was introduced by Hope Not Hate, the anti-racism organisation. He also claimed they’d received £50,000 of taxpayers’ money from the Home Office via Special Branch. It’s possible. Special Branch has been keeping an eye on racists since the 1930s, when they sent their detectives to monitor meetings of the real Nazi groups of the time, like Arnold Leese’s bunch, the Britons and English Mistery. I have mixed feelings about them, though. While they’re right to go hunting Nazis, the bulk of terrorism and political extremism in this country comes from Islamism. There is also a culture of Black and Asian racism that is barely mentioned by the mainstream press and the authorities, as exemplified in in Dawn Butler’s nasty little poem from Black History Month. An investigation of the government deradicalisation programmes found that they had shifted the focus from Islamism to White racism and had frequently been hijacked and co-opted by the Muslim organisations they should have been investigating. There seems to be a deliberate attempt by the authorities to downplay ethnic radicalism and play up indigenous White racism, possibly as a way of avoid accusations of institutional racism and difficult questions about whether or not multiculturalism is really working. I think that’s behind the weird film by Hampshire county council about how to spot radicalisation, where the extremist is a White British lad with an interest in Green politics who leaves anti-immigration literature at a bird watching hide. Hope Not Hate used to investigate Islamic hate preachers as well as White Nazis, but I think they’ve dropped this in order to concentrate on the much safer area of White radicalism. Their inclusion of misogyny as a form of dangerous terrorism seems to me to be a part of the general trend to inflate the danger of White terrorism and disaffection against the genuinely larger threat of Islamism.