Posts Tagged ‘Conservatives’

Open Britain on Farage Telling His Donors He’ll Merge with the Tories

December 3, 2025

This message also contains an appeal for donations. I haven’t donated to them, but I’m leaving it in for anyone who wants to support their campaign for democracy.

‘Dear David,

Nigel Farage is telling donors that a Reform UK–Conservative pact – or even a merger – at the next General Election is “inevitable”.

Not the public, but his wealthy donors. Because that’s how our politics works right now. The people with the chequebooks get the roadmap, and everyone else gets the rehearsed denials.

Farage and Kemi Badenoch will insist there’s nothing in it. But behind closed doors, the conversation is very different.

Reform has momentum. But it doesn’t have the machinery to turn momentum into power: candidates, ground game, data, compliance, local infrastructure – all the unglamorous stuff that actually wins elections. The Conservatives do.

So if you’re a wealthy would-be Reform donor, worried Farage’s party is all heat and no engine, the pitch practically writes itself – don’t worry. We’ll plug Reform into the Conservatives’ ruthlessly effective election-winning machine.

And Farage, reportedly, is already laying down the terms. He’s said to feel “betrayed” by the arrangement he made with Boris Johnson in 2019 over no-deal Brexit – even though, in the long run, it delivered almost everything he wanted. This time, he wants control.

Farage told the Financial Times he’s planning a “reverse takeover”, code for swallowing the Conservatives whole.

Because the real scandal won’t be that politicians said one thing in public and did another in private.

The real scandal is the system that makes this kind of stitch-up not just possible, but rational. Our electoral system rewards it.

First-Past-The-Post turns politics into a zero-sum contest in a handful of seats. It pushes parties into cynical alliances, encourages backroom carve-ups, and lets a minority movement hitch itself to a major party’s infrastructure – and walk into power without ever winning a real national mandate.

A Reform UK–Conservative pact would be Britain’s closest equivalent to MAGA: a long-standing political institution captured by far-right populism, dragging the country towards scapegoats, culture wars, and authoritarian “solutions”.

Whatever you think of the Conservatives now, this would create a new beast entirely.

We’re expected to watch the theatre and pretend we don’t know what’s happening. But we can’t let that happen.

That’s why we’re fighting to fix our broken democracy and make it work for everyone. A system that rewards polarisation, backroom deals, and the wealthy donors bankrolling it is not a system that will ever deliver the solutions we desperately need, including an end to the cost of living crisis.

If you can, please chip in today to support our work. We’re up against a super-wealthy elite trying to buy the system, but if we don’t fight back, who will?

Thank you so much for your support! This is a team effort and we rely on everyone pitching in if we’re to get the change necessary.

Best,

Conor

Conor McKenzie

Digital Engagement Manager
Open Britain’

On the other hand, this may turn many Reform supporters away from them. Farage has based much of his political appeal since UKIP on pretending that his succession of wretched parties aren’t like the others – ‘liblabcon’, as he sneered at them. This would show that Reform are. And very many Reform supporters hate the Tories because of the mass immigration launched by Boris Johnson. So any merger between the two could bring them both down.

We hope.

Open Britain on the Hidden Dangers of Reform UK

November 29, 2025

Nigel Farage has been in the news again this week, denying that he said anything racist when he was schoolkid but somewhat suspiciously not rebutting the specific allegations against him. More seriously, the disappointment and intense criticism of Labour’s budget from both left and right has allowed Farage to join in the attacks, boating that he and reform are ready to takeover when the Starmer government inevitably falls. Open Britain has been warning for years about the dangers of Farage’s outfit. It’s a threat to democracy of the type the architects of the British constitution did not envisage. Reform aren’t a party, but a company, with real power centralised in a few company directors. It also benefits from the soft corruption of secret dark money from donors. Here’s the message I got about their threat a week or so ago from the pro-democracy organiation.

‘David,

Most political parties in Britain are run in broadly similar ways. Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, the SNP, Plaid – they are all member-run organisations. Members elect their leaders, help shape policy, oversee the rules, and ultimately hold power.

Reform UK is something very different.

Farage’s latest venture isn’t structured like a political party at all. It’s structured like a private company.
And that single decision quietly rewrites how power, money and accountability work inside a political movement.

This isn’t about policy. It’s about the health of British democracy, and the risks created when a party chooses a corporate shell over a democratic structure.

While most parties are unincorporated associations, Reform UK is built on two linked companies. A legacy company once privately owned through shares, and a newer company that now sits above it.
On paper, the company lists no people with significant control, a technical classification that makes it harder for the public to see who is actually in charge.

In practice, decisions are concentrated among a small group of directors operating behind closed doors.

Companies operate on a different logic to political parties. Directors hold power, not members. Constitutions can be changed in private. Assets, including cash, belong to the company, not the membership. Transparency requirements are weaker and easier to route around

Nigel Farage has built something Britain has never seen at scale before. A political party run like a private business. And that should concern all of us.

There are three key risks with the corporate, non-democratic approach Reform UK is using.

Risk 1: Money in the Shadows

Yes, Reform UK reports donations to the Electoral Commission. But everything around those rules is harder to see:Money can move between its two companies before reaching regulated accounts.
Revenue from merchandise, events or media can sit outside political rules.

Company donations can hide beneficial ownership.

Loans and services-in-kind face far less scrutiny.

The law was written for political parties, not corporate groups acting like political parties. Even the Electoral Commission admits the rules haven’t kept pace.

This structure doesn’t break the law. It exposes where the law is weakest.

Risk 2: Power Without Accountability

Inside Reform UK, members cannot meaningfully challenge or remove the leader.
Constitutional changes do not require grassroots approval. A handful of directors can shape policy, select candidates, and control governance. Internal checks simply don’t  need to exist.

The way the party is structured gives us a warning about how it would operate from Downing Street. Concentrated power, no guardrails, and a deeply worrying authoritarian drift.

Risk 3: Who Owns a Political Party?

In a normal party, members collectively own the institution. Data, branding, assets and funds belong to the movement.

In a company-based party, they belong to the company. And therefore to its directors.

If Reform UK were wound up, rebranded or merged, supporters would have no rights to the data, the campaign infrastructure, the brand, the merchandise income, the assets, or even the cash in the bank account.

Everyday donors are told they’re funding a grassroots rebellion. In reality, they’re sending their hard-earned cash to a private corporate structure controlled by a small, wealthy inner circle.

The truth is, this isn’t just a personality cult built around one figure, it’s a corporate venture that puts the control and money squarely in the hands of Nigel Farage and his business partners.

 Electoral law wasn’t designed for companies posing as political parties, with opaque ownership and corporate revenue streams.

The Electoral Commission can barely regulate political parties, but corporate entities like Reform UK Party Ltd tests its ability to breaking point.

Reform UK isn’t breaking the rules. It’s ruthlessly exploiting the flaws in our democracy.

This is not a left-right issue, and the other parties aren’t without their faults. But the strength of British democracy depends on political parties that are accountable, transparent, supporter driven, and democratic from the inside out.

Reform UK’s model is an experiment in removing those safeguards. If we do nothing, the precedent will spread.

If Britain wants to stop this model spreading, we need urgent action. Close dark-money loopholes with real “Know Your Donor” checks. Full transparency on who funds our politics.

Shine a light on party-linked companies. If it’s part of a political operation, it should meet political transparency rules.

Guarantee basic internal democracy in all parties. Clear constitutions, accountable leaders, real member rights.

Use consolidated accounting for whole political groups. One organisation, one transparent set of books.

Strengthen an independent Electoral Commission. A watchdog with the power to follow the money and enforce the rules.

This is about ensuring our democracy cannot be quietly hollowed out.

Reform UK has chosen a structure that is less democratic, less transparent and more vulnerable to outside influence than anything we’ve seen in modern British politics.

If we care about transparency, accountability and the resilience of our political system, this model cannot be ignored.

Once political parties become businesses, democracy becomes a transaction. And none of us have a right to a refund when it goes wrong.

All the best,

The Open Britain Team

Sinn Fein Leader Condemns Sectarian Abuse

October 27, 2025

Here’s a really positive story, in contrast to all the other pieces in the news about how politicians both at home here in Britain and across the briny in Ireland and America, are wrecking our great countries. The other day I came across a piece on one of the Irish news channel that Sinn Fein main woman Mary Lou MacDonald had condemned the sectarian abuse hurled at the Fine Gael presidential candidate, Heather somebody or other. This lady had come under attack because fifty years ago her Presbyterian husband had been a member of the Orange Order.

The Orange Order has been highly controversial for a very long time. They caused a lot of outrage a few years ago by deliberately marching through Roman Catholic areas in Ulster. They were following their old, traditional routes. When the marches started, these had been Protestant areas. Or so the argument went. But the demographics had changed, and they were now Roman Catholic. And instead of tradition, it looked to many people like deliberate intimidation and provocation. And distrust and opposition to the Order goes right back to the 19th century. When I was working in the Empire and Commonwealth Museum I found a Blue Book from the 1890s about a governmental investigation of the Order, following complaints about them from Roman Catholics. In this instance, however, the Fine Gael’s lady’s husband’s membership of the organization was fifty years in the past and so should have been of no relevance to her campaign for the presidentcy.

I’d never thought I’d ever see the day, growing up as I did in the 1980s when Ulster was riven by sectarian terrorism between Nationalist and Loyalist. This was a time when Sinn Fein spokesman Gerry Adams talked about ‘the ballot bomb’. The IRA killed Lord Louis Mountbatten, Tory politician Airey Neave. The terror group’s bombing of the Brighton Hotel during the Tory party conference shocked Britain. But now, decades later following the Good Friday Agreement, things are definitely changing. Sinn Fein are trying to reach across the sectarian divide in the hope of peacefully uniting Ulster with Eire. And some Loyalist politicos are responding.

I was greatly impressed by MacDonald’s meeting with the King, where both spoke politely and respectfully to each other. In Ulster, Sinn Fein have organised meetings with members of the Loyalist communist to discuss the position of Loyalist within a united Ireland. Loyalist politicians have stated that a united Ireland is inevitable and that they should do what they can to secure a place in it for their people. One politico said this a week or so ago, but other Loyalists immediately condemned his remarks and sought to distance themselves from him. The Presbyterian church in the Six Counties has encouraged Protestants to learn Gaelic. They’ve put on displays of Presbyterian translations of the Bible into Erse, while historian have found records of Irish Loyalist Gaels fighting in the British army. This is also a very positive step. The Irish language is very much associated with Irish nationalism. At one time speaking it to a policeman would get someone arrested. A few decades ago, Private Eye Reported that Ian Paisley had been outraged by buses in Ulster going around with what he thought was Gaelic writing on them. Er, no. The vehicles were tour buses, and the language was French.

The Northern Irish border is also a nonsensical mess. It crosses people’s gardens and there’s one stretch of road which crosses and crisscrosses it four times in the space of a few miles. Decades ago people were smuggling goods from NI across the border to Eire that were unavailable in the Republic. Ordinary items like Omo washing powder. Brexit, and the issue of a hard border with Eire, or an Irish backstop in the Irish Sea, has been an insurmountable problem. Even for those idiot like Tweezer who claimed it has been a success. . But

Sinn Fein have said that they want to start moves towards reuniting Ulster and the rest of the island of Ireland within ten years. The demographics in Northern Ireland support it, as for the first time the Roman Catholic population is bigger than the Protestant. But there are problems with this, quite apart from the sectarian divided. These are simply the practical issues surrounding the integration of Ulster’s very different legal and governmental systems as well as the NHS. The two establishment Irish parties, Fine Gael and Fianna Foil, were accused of trying to black Irish reunification. I suspect that if this was the case, it was because they were trying to avoid these difficulties. Former taosioch Bertie Aherne, one of the signatories to the Good Friday Agreement, discussed these problems and the economic cost of reunion last week. He said that this was way down the list of problems, but union between north and south wouldn’t pay off for ten years, as well as the other problems mentioned above. But his real concern was that reunification should be done peacefully and in a spirit of reconciliation.

There’s till much bitterness and hostility on both sides which will have to be surmounted. But this clear condemnation of sectarian abuse by the chief of Sinn Fein has shown how far Nationalist politicians have come in rejecting sectarian hatred in pursuit of peacefully reuniting North with South.

If anyone can do this, and create a peacefully united Ireland where Protestant Loyalists live alongside Roman Catholics in the spirit of reconciliation called for by Bertie Aherne, it will be through the efforts of MacDonald and people like here on both sides of the divide.

38 Degrees Petition to Ban Politicians from Hosting Supposedly Impartial News Programmes

October 25, 2025

This petition is particularly relevant to GB News, who have stuffed their supposed impartial news programming with Tory MPs. Like the Young Master, Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Dear David,

Leading politicians can host their own shows on (supposedly) impartial news channels – and media regulator Ofcom is happy to sit back and let it happen. [1]

These shows aren’t news. They’re often borderline political broadcasts that blur the line between fact and opinion, potentially giving some politicians a huge boost. Nigel Farage gets his own GB News show. Labour minister David Lammy used to have an LBC radio show. [2]

News should challenge power, David, not give it a platform.

But today we have a chance to get these shows banned – if we move quickly. The minister in charge of Ofcom, Lisa Nandy, just said she’s worried about this exact issue. [3] But she’s unlikely to take action unless she sees how much we, the public, care. If all of us come together now to call on her to ban ALL politicians from hosting these shows, it could push her into action. [4]

So David, can you sign this new petition calling on Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to ban politicians – from all parties – from hosting their own shows on – supposedly – impartial news channels?

I’LL SIGN

I’m not signing because…

Ofcom has tried to investigate politicians’ shows for breaking its rules before. But they had to stop because their own rules were too weak! There’s a simple answer to that: change the rules. But it’ll take the minister in charge of Ofcom stepping in to make that happen. [5]

And it couldn’t come at a more important time. GB News has just expanded into the US with the backing of President Trump (you can bet he’s hoping it can help him polish up his UK image!).

Clearly, GB News bosses weren’t worried about Ofcom so if we don’t act now, it could turn into a huge propaganda machine. [6]

If you’re worried about this too sign the petition today to call for a ban on politicians hosting shows on UK news channels.

I’LL SIGN

I’m not signing because…

Thanks for all you do,
Alicia, Matt, Veronica and the 38 Degrees team

NOTES:
[1] The Guardian: GB News’s US expansion feared to be new way for Trumpian views to reach UK audience 
[2] BBC News: Ofcom warns broadcasters over using politician hosts before general election 
The Independent: Labour MP David Lammy says goodbye to LBC show ahead of general election 
[3] Deadline: Nigel Farage Hosting Show On GB News While Running A Political Party Is “Completely Unsatisfactory,” Lisa Nandy Says 
[4] The Guardian: GB News’s US expansion feared to be new way for Trumpian views to reach UK audience 
[5] BBC: Ofcom drops investigations after GB News ruling 
[6] The Guardian: GB News’s US expansion feared to be new way for Trumpian views to reach UK audience 

Open Britain on Plaid Cymru Defeating Reform at the Caerphilly Bye-Election

October 25, 2025

Dear David,

Yesterday’s Senedd by-election in Caerphilly was historic. Yet another glaring sign that politics-as-usual is over and done with.

Plaid Cymru soared to victory on nearly half the vote, Reform UK underperformed based on expectations (but still came in at a significant 36%), and Labour received a dismal 11% of the vote – in a seat they’ve held for the past century.

In 2021, Labour and the Conservatives together received 63% of the vote in Caerphilly. In 2025, it was just 13%.

Despite a massive electronic billboard in Caerphilly declaring that “only Labour can stop Reform,” voters overwhelmingly threw their support behind Plaid Cymru. Although many framed the contest as a two-way battle between Labour and Reform – a potential preview of the next General Election – the public rejected both the government’s message and Reform’s toxic politics.

Reform have been humbled. Farage doubled down on this by election, spending liberally to spread his xenophobic message, attempting to bring out disengaged voters fed up with Starmer. Reform reportedly had a celebration planned, but in the end, candidate Llyr Powell declined interviews and refused to even give a concession speech.

With a record turnout of over 50%, this was no protest vote. Once again, the declining confidence in Government and the traditional two-party system is on full display. Caerphilly showed us that while Farage benefits tremendously from distrust, voters can unify together to reject his noxious politics – and it doesn’t have to be behind Labour.

But in seats without a strong regional party like Plaid, results like this will be hard to replicate. Under First-Past-The-Post (FPTP), it’s more likely that Labour, the Greens and the Lib Dems will split the vote and pave the way for a narrow (and disproportional) Reform victory. With Labour’s record unpopularity, it’s unlikely that tactical voting will be enough.

Across Britain, five parties now poll in double digits. In Wales and Scotland, Plaid and the SNP are seeing massive resurgence (which is almost always an inverse trend of confidence in Westminster). Our politics has outgrown the system designed to contain it, but the system hasn’t changed.

POWER THE PUSHBACK

Farage knows his only path forward is under FPTP. It’s the only way he can split the opposition and turn minority support into outsized wins.

In 2026, Senedd elections will move to a proportional system. Westminster must follow. Britain can’t function as a multi-party democracy trapped in a two-party voting system.

That’s why we’re working with our allies in Parliament through the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Fair Elections to fix this. We need a National Commission on Electoral Reform to finally deliver a fair, proportional voting system that reflects Britain today.

Because the next political earthquake won’t only shake Wales, it could bring the whole structure down.

HELP FIX OUR DEMOCRACY

Change doesn’t come easily, but it starts when people refuse to look away.

Thanks for your support!

Cheers,

Matt Gallagher

Communications Officer

Open Britain

Open Britain on the Appointment of Lucy Powell as Deputy Leader of the Labour Party – A Step Forward for Party Democracy

October 25, 2025

Dear David,

Lucy Powell has just been unveiled as the new Deputy Leader of the Labour Party.

Despite being demoted from the role of Leader of the House in the recent Cabinet reshuffle, she has defeated Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson by an enormous 14,000 votes.

It’s no secret the Prime Minister wanted Phillipson to win, amid a number of anonymous briefings criticising Powell coming out of Number 10.

Phillipson herself even claimed the election of Powell would lead to further ‘division’ within the party, as her lack of a Ministerial brief would allow her to be more vocal in her criticism of the leadership. But it’s precisely that argument which HELPED Powell to victory – and made her the more appealing option in the eyes of party members.

It’s clear the membership are increasingly frustrated with the direction of their party under Starmer’s leadership. Whilst some of this is due to the policies Labour are pursuing, so much of this disillusionment comes from a failure to address fundamental issues in our democracy – the kind previous Tory governments perpetuated, which we were told this party would resolve

Powell’s pitch addressed some of these matters:

  • Looser whips, to allow MPs to vote in line with their conscience more often, and not be suspended so quickly.
  • ⁠Greater consideration for party conference motions, to reflect the will of members, and avoid embarrassments like the winter fuel U-turn.
  • ⁠Closer interaction with backbench MPs, and a Cabinet looking out to the party rather than making decisions whilst facing inwards.

It was this final point in particular that likely played a large part in the win for Powell.

She can speak to backbench MPs and feed their concerns back to Keir and the Cabinet freely and publicly – Phillipson remains bound by her brief. In a party where so many feel their voices simply aren’t being heard – this proved decisive.

And Lucy Powell has previously raised wider concerns about people believing their voices aren’t being heard – in the context of our voting system. Although she hasn’t made electoral reform a central pledge of her Deputy Leadership campaign, Powell said in a Q&A session at party conference last month that she has “always supported electoral reform”, acknowledging that “it comes up all the time, it’s very important to party members”.

We are pleased to see an advocate of more proportional voting at the top of the Labour Party, and we hope she can put pressure on the Prime Minister and the government to adopt this as policy.

In particular, we will encourage Lucy Powell join her Manchester party colleague Andy Burnham, and over 150 other Parliamentarians in our APPG for Fair Elections, in calling for a National Commission on Electoral Reform (NCER). This is a logical step the government can take to acknowledge that FPTP is not fit for purpose, and that we need a new voting system.  combination of British people and experts will then determine what the best proportional voting system to replace this may be.

It’s clear Powell’s victory represents an opportunity for Labour to change course, and not only act in a manner more representative of its membership, but make upgrades to our democracy which would be welcomed across the political spectrum.

As trust in the government and our politics more widely continues to fall – we hope she is successful in this mission.

All the best,

James Patrick

Campaigns and Content Officer, Open Britain

Reform Voters in Kent Furious as Governing Party Admits They Need to Raise Taxes

October 18, 2025

Sorry I’ve been away for a little while. Some of this is illness, some of it is just having other things to do, as well as quiet exasperation at the state of Britain and its politics. But this is a story I couldn’t ignore, and though you’d all like to enjoy it.

According to the Torygraph, Reform voters in Kent have got their collective, neoliberal, low tax, small government knickers in a twist and are spitting teeth because the party they voted into office with its promise to cut council spending has in act, er, admitted that the council tax actually needs to go up.

Reform council leader Lynden Kemkanan has said that funding is already cut to the bone and that the Tories have left them a massive black hole in council finances. In order to maintain the same level of services, they will probably have to raise council tax by five per cent. She still maintains, however, that Reform are still intent on cutting taxes.

This contradicts the party’s pledge that they would be ruthless in cutting taxes, like Donald Trump’s DOGE department.

The result, from what I can see, is that Reform’s supporters are turning on the party. The rest of the Torygraph article includes brief interviews with former supporters complaining that they’ll never vote for them again and that they’re ‘like all the others’.

Paradoxically, I’m rather reassured by this.

Don’t get me wrong, Farage and his crew with their dreams of cutting taxes and ‘small government’, which always means more privatisation and deregulation, are a threat to the NHS, welfare state and public services. Mike has also pointed out that they’re a threat to the environment. They’re funded by the oil lobby, and so attack renewable and clean energy. The oil barons behind them have trashed the Louisiana swamplands with oil, and I have no doubt that let loose over here, they’ll trash our green and pleasant land as well. For this alone, Farage and the rest of them should be nowhere near government.

But I am reassured that in this case, when they actually got in government, they were mugged by reality and have had to drop the election promises they couldn’t keep.

And it’s highly ironic that a party to the right of the Tories is also blaming them for leaving financial black holes.

GB News Goes Even Further Right with Nick Tenconi Interview

September 21, 2025

GB News, according to one Labour politicians, has two political biases – right and far right. It has acted as a kind of broadcasting retirement home for Tory politicos, like Jacob Rees-Mogg. At one point there were six of the blaggards on the channel, all while it was assuring Ofcom that it really wasn’t, politically biased. Pull the other one, as they say. A few days ago they went far right when their man, and I use the word loosely, Dan Wooton, interviewed Nick Tenconi.

Who he?, as Private Eye would put it.

Nick Tenconi is the current head of UKIP. He was one of the patriots who went on the Unite the Kingdom March to be harangued by the likes of Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk. I think that many of those who went were simply ordinary, genuinely patriotic Brits worried about immigration and feeling that Britain and her civilisation is under attack. But not necessarily racists or Fascists. The former head of the Council for Racial Equality, Trevor Phillips, was there, and talked about his impressions of it on Sky News. He just said they were the kind of people you’d meet in country pubs and in the queue for the gents at football matches. And there were several Black marchers. I have seen videos in which Black patriots have said that they emigrated to England because it was English, and they didn’t want the White English to become a minority. One of the Black women, actually I think she was mixed race, said that her grandfather came here from South Africa. Nobody helped him, but he rose by his own efforts and she was grateful for the opportunities Britain had given her family. So are a lot of people of colour, who are getting sick of the grievance politics of the Labour party. At the last election 1 million of them went off and voted Tory. There ‘s a similar ‘Blaxodus’ going on in America, with prosperous, self-reliant Blacks leaving the Democrats, who they fear are using welfare policies to keep them ‘on the reservation’ as a subservient client group. These are the same fears of many of the people of colour who defected to the Tories. They are afraid that Labour’s affirmative action policies not only ignore how some of them are doing well, much better than the White population in some demographics, but will be used to keep them down.

But in Tenconi’s case, I think you can call him ‘fascistic’, if not actually fascist.

I’ve an interest in Fascism, and considerable sympathy for the corporate state, in which parliament is set up as a chamber of corporations, each corporation including the mangers’ organisations and trade unions for various of sectors of industry, and which claimed to allow the ‘producers’ to manage the economy. In actuality, it acted as a rubber stamp for whatever il Duce wanted to do at the time. But I do feel we need and industrial chamber to represent working people, who have been excluded from proper representation by the political parties whose MPs are overwhelmingly millionaires, company directors and senior management. As I’ve made clear on this blog, I despise the totalitarianism, the police state, the brutality, the lawlessness, the racism and anti-Semitism,, the militarism and imperialism of Fascism everything that made real Fascism the violent, repulsive dictatorship it was.

Tenconi doesn’t wear a black shirt, but he certainly hated the same things they hated. He announced that they were against Islamism, communism, socialism and liberalism. Behind every liberal there was a socialist, behind every socialist there was a communist, and the commies were doing deals with the Islamists. He was also against the Far Right, which meant the ethnonationalists and the BNP. If you leave out Islam, and substitute ‘Jews’, this is basically the same as the Fascists and Nazis. They also hated liberalism and democracy, as well as socialism and communism. However, Italian Fascism before it fell in with Hitler and his grotesques, wasn’t racist. It was militantly nationalist, but many members were Jews because it respected them as fellow Italians in contrast to the previous states that had been swallowed up and incorporated into the new Italy by Garibaldi and Cavour. As regards Islam, several people on the Fascist right, including one of Duce’s mistresses, were strongly impressed by Sufism. I think the mistress even converted.

Now I agree that Islamism is a threat, though not Muslims, and that the people screaming hatred for ‘man-made law’ and demanding sharia rule ought to be treated as fascists because of the anti-democratic, religious supremacist nature of their beliefs. They should be treated exactly the same as Christian clerical fascists. Whom Tenconi comes very close to when he started going on about how he wanted a band of ‘Christian knights to defend Christianity’.

This last reminded me very strongly of an interview with the head of the BNP from the 70s, who said that they were looking for ‘robust young men who would defend the country from communism’.

And, er, where are these communists? They aren’t a mass party, and haven’t ever been one. The best they did at a general election was in the 1970s, perhaps 75 or 77, when things really were falling about and so the final fall of capitalism could look credible. But that was the best they did. I think the British Communist party collapsed with the general collapse of communism in eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the late 80s. The Trotskyite Socialist Workers Party has survived, now rebranded as the Socialist Party, and are still holding public meetings and marching on protests. But they are a small group, and although I think they may well have been the largest of the Marxist grouplets, they’re nowhere near a mainstream party or a threat to democracy. Where Marxism is a problem, it’s in the universities and the education system with genuinely far-left lecturers and teachers promoting Critical Race Theory, racial awareness directed at teaching Whites they are unfairly privileged and should feel guilty about their ancestors’ treatment of Black and certain forms of extremist feminism which have the same attitude towards White men. Although it also needs to be said that the feminist lecturers who taught me at UWE were very clear on separating feminism from misandry. I certainly cannot accuse them of promoting hatred of men, or treating me and the other guys differently from the women.

As for socialists, we need socialism more than ever. It is a great pity that Corbin’s YourParty is now imploding. We need charismatic politicians to stand up for the welfare state, the NHS, proper nationalised industries and trade unions that genuinely represent working men and women, not Starmerist neoliberalism. Britain and England have a very strong, native tradition of working class radical activism, including the Levellers and Diggers of the British Civil War, Tom Paine and the Corresponding Societies who supported the French Revolution, the Utopian Socialist Robert Owen, the Chartists, the Fabians, the Independent Labour Party as well as Hyndeman’s Marxist Social Democratic Federation. Not to mention the Victorian critic, John Ruskin et al. Many of the members of the British Labour party were strongly Christian. Years ago a book appeared about what the working class had read throughout history. In the 1920s the favourite reading of Welsh Labour members, no doubt reflecting their Methodist, chapel background, was the Bible. This has been considerably weakened through secularisation and the social liberalism that came in with the ’60s, but it’s still there. CND was led by a Roman Catholic monsignor, Bruce Kent, before he left the Church, or was defrocked, and people I know who attended the peace marches told me it included Franciscan friars. That was forty years ago, but I think the tradition still persists.

And there is a real difference between a traditional Old Labour socialist, who wants a mixed economy but also believes in democracy, loathes any kind of dictatorship and believes powerfully in free speech. The sort of people who gave Khrushchev such a rough ride over the maltreatment of democratic socialists in the USSR when he came to England that he got on better with the Tories. Yes, he said ‘If I was British, I would have been a Conservative.’

Socialism, anti-British? I think not!

I don’t believe that the people who marched for Unite the Kingdom were Fascists. Real Fascism has never been popular in the UK. Researchers into groups like the BNP, NF and other thugs have reported that these groups have a very high membership turnover, and their actual core membership is tiny, perhaps only 200 or so. I think most of their members joined simply because they want an end to immigration and ethnic minorities out. This is deeply unpleasant, but they weren’t interested in overthrowing the state and establishing a racist, Aryan dictatorship. Nor in having their ears bent by Nick Griffin, John Tyndale or whoever about nationalist ideology. But rightists like Tenconi, Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe and the others really don’t represent the working class.

If they get their way, they will privatise the NHS, destroy whatever’s left of the welfare state, and still retain neoliberalism, even as they rail against the ‘globalists’. They will also make our own corrupt political system even worse as dark money and undisclosed corporate donations talk, and bullsh*t walks.

For these reasons, if for no other, they must be stopped.

Radical Ballad from the West Midlands: Freedom and Reform

August 17, 2025

This comes from the Joan Mills channel on YouTube, and comes from a companion record by Mills and Michael Raven to a selection of radical 19th century protest songs from the West Midlands, edited by Michael Raven and with the same title, The Jolly Machine (Michael Raven 1974, 2nd edition 1991). The notes to the tune on page 25 says that the song comes from a 19th century broadside printed by W.S. Foretey of Birmingham. ‘It is a general plea for support of the Liberal movement and its champions, Gladstone, Beale and Bright. Such please played their part in rousing public opinion among the working classes in the days when newspapers were both in their infancy and comparatively expensive. The last years of the 19th century saw many reforms particularly in the fields of electoral franchise and education’.

The song demands full manhood suffrage, urges support for the Liberals and Gladstone as the true friends of working men, and state very clearly that the ‘Tories keep you down’. Which they do, although I would extend this to all the mainstream parties, including Labour, and Reform and their competitors on the anti-immigration right.

Here’s the book cover:

This is the broadsheet.

And this is the sheet music

38 Degrees Petition Against £20 Charge to See Doctor

July 18, 2025

Sajid Javid has raised his grubby Tory head again. He’s called for the introduction of a £20 charge on people seeing their GPs. As the petition states, this idea was mooted by the last government three years ago. Also, Nigel Farage is calling for an end to the NHS being funded through taxation, but hasn’t said how he thinks it should be funded. Well, Farage has said in the past that he would like it replaced by the American system of private insurance, and without state funding that’s basically the only way it could be funded.

I’m ashamed to say that Javid comes from my own fair city of Bristol, where his father was a bus driver. Apparently. He’s a disgrace to the city like his party and Nigel Farage are disgraces to national politics.

‘It’s unbelievable David. Former health secretary, Sajid Javid, is calling for us to be charged £20 for a GP appointment. [1] There’s no nice way to put this, he wants to see people being charged for being sick – ending our NHS as we know it. 

The good news? Right now this is just a proposal David, and Wes Streeting has the power to stop this terrible idea. But it’s going to take all of us who care about the NHS speaking up today if we’re going to stop this from becoming a reality.

If we all sign our petition saying – a LOUD – no to GP appointment charges, they’ll be forced to listen to us. Let’s get everyone we know to add their name, to show those in power (and those who want to be in power) that the British public will NEVER stand for the sick being charged for being sick.

 So David, will you sign the petition to the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, letting him know that we will NEVER accept GP appointment charges? If each of us reading this email adds our name, and passes it on it’ll stamp out this idea right now. Clicking the button below will add your name automatically with one click:

I’LL SIGN

‘m not signing because…

Here’s what the petition says: 

To: The Health Secretary, Wes Streeting

Stamp out any talk of charging the sick for being sick! Healthcare is a right for all of us who need it, not a privilege. Our NHS has always been free when we need it. Promise to keep it that way.

I’LL SIGN

What’s worse, Sajid Javid isn’t the only one peddling this dangerous idea right now – some current MPs, like Nigel Farage, are calling for an end to funding the NHS through taxes – without saying how it should be paid for. It’s worrying. [2] 

And this isn’t the first time politicians have tried introducing NHS charges – the previous government tried to pull this one on us three years ago! But 132,681 of us signed – to say NO to privatised healthcare – and our free GP appointments were saved. [3] We fought them off then and if enough rally behind our NHS today, we can win again.

So, will you speak up for our NHS today, David? Clicking the button below will add your name automatically with one click:

‘LL SIGN

I’m not signing because…

Thanks for all that you do.

Alicia, Mike, Robin and the NHS Protection Team

NOTES:
[1] (Paywall) Telegraph: Charge NHS GP appointments Sajid Javid
Pulse Today: Former health secretary backs £20 fee for GP appointments
[2] Independent: Farage calls for end to funding NHS through taxes
BMA: BMA condemns Sunak’s plan for £10 missed GP appointments fine
[3] 38 Degrees: Sign the petition: say no to privatised healthcare


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started