And now something from British working class history. This is another video I found on YouTube on the Windborne Singers’ own channel. It’s of them back in 2020 performing the Chartists’ Anthem with musicians and performers from the Celtic Christmas Festival. The Chartists were the working class movement in the first half of the 19th century that demanded the vote for all working men over 21. They weren’t a socialist movement as such, as they included advocates of free trade alongside the followers of the utopian socialist Robert Owen, trade unionists and Irish patriots campaigning for home rule. But they are a significant part of British working class history and have influenced subsequent left-wing movements like the Labour party. The song depicts working men and women marching, as they have done for a thousand years, despite their heavy load. I think the Anthem, which is very much a folk piece, is a genuine Chartist piece as many of the radical and left-wing movements produced their own songs and ballads. A number of other groups have also covered the song, including British popsters Chumbawamba, whose version can also be found on YouTube.
Posts Tagged ‘Irish Home Rule’
The Windborne Singers Perform ‘The Chartist Anthem’
May 4, 2022Tags:Chumbawamba, Irish Home Rule, Labour Party, Robert Owen, Windborne Singers, Working Class, Youtube
Posted in Chartism, Economics, History, Ireland, Music, Politics, Popular Music, Socialism, Trade Unions | Leave a Comment »
Henry Hyndman and the Democratic Federation
May 10, 2014Henry Hyndman, founder of the Democratic Federation
One of the first Socialist parties in the latter 19th century was Henry Hyndman’s Democratic Federation, founded in 1881. Hyndman corresponded with Marx about reviving Chartism, and intended his new Federation to be a working class organisation continuing ‘the great work of Spence and Owen, , Stephens and Oastler, O’Connor and O’Brien, Ernest Jones and George J. Harney’. Beer in his History of British Socialism considered that his ideas were derived from Marx, Bronterre O’Brien and Benjamin Disraeli. At its founding conference in June 8th, 1881, the party decided on the following programme:
1. Universal suffrage.
2. Triennial parliaments.
3. Equal electoral divisions.
4. Payment of members.
5. Corruption and bribery of the electors to be punishable as criminal offences.
6. Abolition of the House of Lords as a legislative body.
7. Home rule for Ireland.
8. Self-government for the colonies and dependencies.
9. Nationalisation of the land.
They presented a more Socialist programme in their 1883 pamphlet, Socialism Made Plain. This urged working people to campaign for the following:
1. Erection of healthy dwellings by the central or local authorities and letting them at low rents to working men.
2. Free and universal education and at least one free meal for school children.
3. An eight-hour day.
4. Progressive taxation on incomes over £300.
5. Establishment of national banks and gradual abolition of private banking.
6. Nationalisation of railways and land.
7. Organisation of the unemployed under State control on co-operative principles.
8. Rapid redemption of the national debt.
Most of their programme had become law by the late 20th century. However, we’re now seeing these reforms increasingly attacked. Workers are increasingly required to work far longer than eight hours as part of their normal working day under various clauses in their contracts. Free education is under attack as the government engages on its programme of piecemeal privation of the school system. The railways were privatised by John Major. And the system of council housing was destroyed by Thatcher and her policies continued by Tony Blair. These reforms should all be revived and actively demanded.
One of the points that has not been put into practice, but which I strongly believe should, is no. 7: organisation of the unemployed under State control on co-operative principles. This was harking back to the National Workshops of Louis Blanc, which were opened and undermined through government hostility in the Revolution of 1848. They were intended to provide work for the unemployed, who would manage them and share the profits. Under the Tories, the present system of unemployment benefit is deliberately intended to be as humiliating as possible in order to drive the jobless into any kind of work, no matter how poorly paid and with poor working conditions. They are moreover seen as a source of cheap labour for the companies participating in the Workfare programmes. We desperately need a system of unemployment benefit and state provision of work that builds and empowers people. I’d like there to be ways in which the unemployed themselves can seize power so that they can force the government to treat them with humanity and dignity. The government’s lauded campaign to create a more entrepreneurial Britain by forcing the unemployed to classify themselves as self-employed in order to keep receiving benefits is woefully inadequate and doesn’t even come close.
Tags:'History of British Socialism', Beer, Bronterre O'Brien, Co-operatives, Colonial Self-Government, Conservatives, Council Housing, Disraeli, Ernest Jones, George J Harney, Henry Hyndman, House of Lords, Income Tax, Irish Home Rule, Land, Land Nationalisation, Louis Blanc, Marx, National Debt, National Workshop, Owen, Railways, School Meals, Self-Employed, Spence, Workfare
Posted in Banks, Chartism, Democracy, Education, Factories, France, History, Ireland, Politics, Poverty, Socialism, Uncategorized, Unemployment, Welfare Benefits | 3 Comments »