Posts Tagged ‘Deep South’

Vox Political: Tory MP’s Stupid Comments about Person with Learning Difficulties Sanctioned, Left to ‘Starve in the Dark’

February 7, 2016

Here’s another story from Vox Political that will make your blood boil, and astonish you with the sheer crass stupidity and insensitivity on the Conservative party. In his article, http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/02/07/how-many-other-tories-share-starve-in-the-dark-mark-spencers-views/ Mike reports that Labour’s shadow civil society minister, Lisa Nandy, told the Commons during a debate on Wednesday about poverty in the UK, how one of her constituents was sanctioned after arriving only four minutes late for an interview at the Job Centre. The man has learning difficulties, and was left without food or electricity. Mark Spencer, one of the genuine morons elected to join the Tory madhouse, declared this would teach the man better time-keeping, and blamed the education system for not curing his ‘learning difficulties’. A political scientist from Manchester Uni, accused hims of leaving the poor to starve in the dark.

Sometimes I wonder where the Tories find these people. Four minutes is hardly terribly late, and certainly not enough to warrant leaving someone without their food or power, except in the warped view of the DWP, which is desperately trying to find any excuse to throw people off benefits. Moreover, as any fule kno, most ‘learning difficulties’ can’t be cured simply through education. The term frequently refers to people, who have some kind of mental handicap. They’re incurable, or require special assistance in order to help them function in society. Like all the mentally handicapped people, who were educated in special schools, and are employed under particular schemes designed to give them work.

Spencer undoubtedly believes he’s just a bluff, straight-talking bloke, who simply says what things are. In other words, he’s the type of right-wing windbag you can find in many bars, sounding off about things they really don’t understand with all the confidence and self-assurance of the complacently ignorant. The Tories have been particularly successful in attracting any number of these ignorant so-and-sos to their ranks. Remember Matthew Freud, formerly a member of New Labour, and before then a lawyer for the Dirty Digger’s squalid empire, who declared that ‘the poor should be more flexible than the rich, because they have less to lose’. Or the Tory grandee, who described the homeless as ‘the people you step over leaving the opera’. And I don’t doubt there’s more. Many, many more. Mike even asks in his article how many share Spencer’s repulsive views. The answer is ‘quite a few, I should think.’

Once upon a time, Tory backbench MPs used to cause a scandal making racist comments about Blacks and Asians. They’ve clearly been told to shut up about race by Cameron, so they can no longer try and ‘outnigger’ each other, in the slang of the American Deep South for such politicised racist rhetoric. But the disabled and poor are still fair game. Last week I posted up a piece on the term ‘outnigger’, and wondered what the equivalent for the expression of competitive political contempt for the disabled would be. Florence, one of the commenters here, suggested ‘outmengle’. From Mengele, the infamous Nazi doctor. Well, it describes Spencer. He definitely has tried to ‘outmengle’ his rivals. He has both expressed his contempt for the weak, and the Social Darwinist ideal that they should have nothing done for them and be left to starve. We can definitely say that Florence’s neologism applies to him. And you can bet he isn’t the only one. Expect more outmengling of the physically and mentally handicapped as parliament goes on and the loudmouths get bolder.

An Old Southern Word for Competitive Political Racism

February 3, 2016

I found a term in the book, You All Spoken Here, by Roy Wilder (New York: Viking Penguin 1984) that exactly describes the competitive use of racial rhetoric to beat a political rival. The book’s subtitled ‘A Plunder Room of Words and Phrases used in Common and Not-So-Common Speech As It Is Spoken in Southern Parts of the United States’. In the chapter ‘Reflections on the Political Scene’, it has the term ‘outnigger’, which it defines as ‘Exceed one’s opponent in expressing anti-Black hostility’.

It’s an ugly term, for an ugly practice, and it basically describes the entire Republican stance on race. It’s all carefully veiled, and few of the Republican candidates would ever forthrightly express their hatreds and prejudices in such crude and blatant terms, but nevertheless it describes the boiling hatred they have for Blacks, Mexicans and Muslims, and the way the candidates have competed to express their hostility to those ethnic minorities. It’s couched in the debates about affirmative action programmes and immigration, but nevertheless, it’s still there. And the clear winner in this odious contest is Donald Trump, who has ‘outn*ggered’ everyone when it comes to Mexicans and Muslims.

Of course, this kind of vile rhetoric isn’t confined to the US. It’s been used over here by the Tories and outright Fascist groups like the BNP, ever since the 1970s when some Nazi came up with the slogan, If you want a N*gger for a neighbour, vote Labour’.

And that kind of vile rhetoric isn’t confined to racial groups, either. Under the Tories the right have been doing their utmost to reach new depths smearing and vilifying the unemployed, the poor and the disabled. I think we need a new term to describe this form of political slander.

In the meantime, let’s be brutally honest. Donald Trump is indeed a racist, a throwback to the kind of hick politician associated with the Deep South. And he owes much of his political success so far to outn*ggering everyone in his determination to play on racial fears and hate.