I know this is a provocative question, but it needs to be asked. Yesterday Mike put up an excellent piece about the hypocrisy and moral cowardice of the Labour leadership. Angela Rayner had admitted that Jeremy Corbyn was right when he said that the amount of anti-Semitism in the Labour party was exaggerated. Nevertheless, it was right to suspend him because of the hurt they caused. Mike points out in his article that Rayner has effectively admitted what the victims of the anti-Semitism smear campaign have known for years – that Labour will expel people who tell the truth about it. He also says
“Hurt” and “distress” are irrelevant if they are not based on facts. And how do we know that the people saying they were “hurt” and “distressed” actually were? There are a lot of liars out there.
Quite. As the old saying goes, ‘truth hurts’. And it seems from this that the self-proclaimed ‘Jewish community’ that claims to be so hurt, simply can’t or won’t handle the truth. But then, they don’t represent the Jewish community, and they aren’t really hurt by anti-Semitism.
Organisations behind Anti-Semitism Smears Unrepresentative of Britain’s Jews
How dare I say these terrible things, which I dare say some people could twist to sound anti-Semitic. Easily, because the facts are on my side. The people behind the accusations and smears that Jeremy Corbyn and the party he led were anti-Semitic most certainly don’t represent all of the Jewish community, but Zionist sectarians. Tony Grenstein and other great, self-respecting Jewish anti-racists and critics of Zionism have pointed out again and yet again that these accusations come from Zionist organisation. The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism was founded in 2012 or thereabout specifically to combat the rising hostility to Israel provoked by the bombing of Gaza. Labour Against Anti-Semitism are pretty much the same type of people in the Labour party. The Jewish Labour Movement used to be Paole Zion, Workers of Zion, and is the sister party to the Zionist Israeli Labour Party. In my view, both of these groups are deceptively and deliberately misnamed. The Campaign Against Zionism should be renamed the Campaign For Anti-Semitism, as it exists solely to manufacture accusations of Jew-hatred. As for the Jewish Labour Movement, it’s been shown that you don’t have to be Jewish or a member of the Labour party to join. It’s really a Zionist infiltration group, but obviously ain’t going to describe itself as such. And they will probably accuse you of spreading the anti-Semitic trope of Jewish conspiracies if you do. Nevertheless, it’s the truth. And the truth ain’t racist or anti-Semitic. It just is.
Chief Rabbis Sacks and Mirvis Ultra-Zionists
As for Chief rabbis Jonathan Sacks and Ephraim Mirvis, or ‘Mirv the Perv’ as I think he should be known, both of these gentlemen are, in my opinion, racist ultra-Zionists. Yes, I realise that over here they talk the language of anti-racism and interfaith dialogue. But Mirv spent years learning the Torah in one the hardline Israeli settlements. The settlers, or at least a very large majority of them, believe that all of Eretz Israel should belong to the state of Israel, and the Palestinians expelled and their lands colonised by Jews. Sacks and Mirvis also took contingents of British Jews to the March of the Flags in Jerusalem, despite pleas from British Jewish organisations not to do so. What’s the March of the Flags? It’s the day when the Israeli equivalent of Fascist boot-boys march through the Muslim quarter of Jerusalem waving the Israeli flag and vandalising Palestinian property. Palestinian kids are told not to go out on that day for fear of assault by these thugs. I see no difference between it and the Orange Marches through Roman Catholic areas in Northern Ireland. Or indeed through the attempted marches of Oswald Moseley and the British Union of Fascists through the East End of London and other Jewish areas in the 1930s.
Board of Deputies Zionist and Sectarian
Then there’s the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which sounds like it should represent the whole Jewish community. It don’t. It doesn’t represent secular Jews, who comprise a third of all British Jews. They also don’t represent the Orthodox, who have their own, separate organisation. And they really don’t represent Haredi Jews, who reject Israel because it’s a secular state. For the Haredi and Jews like them, Israel can only be restored by the Almighty through the Messiah. Until that time, the Children of Israel are required to remain in galut – exile – and pray for the health of the city, just as their ancestors did in exile in Babylon. Haredi Jews are viciously persecuted by the Israeli state because they refuse to recognise it. From what I gather, they are due to overtake the United Synagogue as the main Jewish sect in Britain in a few decades. And they have particular respect for Jeremy Corbyn for the efforts he and Diane Abbott have made on behalf of their community.
Tony Greenstein and others have pointed out that the Board of Deputies is, by its constitution, a Zionist organisation. So it obviously doesn’t represent non- or anti-Zionist Jews. These range from religious Jews, like the Haredi, to politically liberal and secular Jews, who object to the Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Whether religious or secular, these Jews believe that by doing so, Israel is violating the central tenets of traditional Jewish morality. As someone once said, ‘To be a Jew is always to side with the oppressed, never the oppressors’. In fact, the Board really only represents the United Synagogue. And probably not all of them, as some have sitting representatives where there hasn’t been an election for years. Other synagogues won’t allow women to vote. And the fact that it is the United Synagogue driving these smears is shown very clearly in many of the articles the I has published smearing Labour as anti-Semitic. Alongside the name of the author of so many of these hit pieces was the statement that they were a member of the United Synagogue. The Board is therefore a sectarian organisation, that no more speaks for the whole of the Jewish community than the Archbishop of Canterbury speaks for all British Christians, who are also divided into a number of different sects and denominations.
Corbyn Not Anti-Semitic
As for the hurt these mamzers claim to have felt, it’s a peculiarly selective kind of hurt. The South African Jewish politico, Andrew Feinstein posted a video this weekend showing very clearly that Corbyn wasn’t an anti-Semite. This includes footage of the former Labour leader denouncing it and all other forms of racism in a fiery speech in 2002 and of him meeting and being warmly greeted by members of the Jewish community, including a rabbi. Feinstein showed stats from a 2015 survey showing that Labour had the second-lowest incidence of anti-Semitism in British political parties. Two years later, another survey showed that Labour was the joint lowest.
Feinstein’s arguments should carry particular weight, as he has personal, family experience of real, murderous anti-Semitism. His mother’s family is a holocaust survivor, who lost 39 members of her family in Auschwitz. Feinstein has not only been to Auschwitz, but has also lectured there. I believe he was also subjected to anti-Semitic abuse by a real Fascist, which is where the vast majority of real anti-Semitism lies.
Hypocrites Behind Smears Not Concerned with Greater Anti-Semitism in Tories and Fascism
I believe the same stats showed that there was more anti-Semitism in the Tory party. And certainly the internet fan groups for BoJob and Jacob Rees Mogg the blogger Jacobs Mates dug up includes among their vicious racists and Islamophobes anti-Semites, who believe that non-White immigration is an evil plot by the Jews to exterminate the White race. Labour was placed under immense pressure to adopt the I.H.R.A. definition of anti-Semitism in full, complete with examples. But no such pressure was placed on the Tories, who haven’t. It’s a peculiar kind of hurt, that has no objection to anti-Semitism in the Tories, but like Violet Elizabeth Bott in the Just William books ‘thcweems and thcweems’ until it’s sick at its much lower incidence in Labour.
Anti-Semitism Smears Weapon to Defend Israel against Criticism
Of course the Jewish organisations accusing Labour of anti-Semitism aren’t doing it because of real anti-Semitism. They’re doing it because they want to defend Israel. Israel’s behaviour towards the Palestinians is indefensible on rational, factual grounds, so all they can do is smear critics as anti-Semites. As Norman Finkelstein, another leading Jewish critic of Israel has said, the Israel lobby is a machine for manufacturing anti-Semites.
And Jews like Andrew Feinstein are horrified and sickened by the cynical, political use of such accusations, not least because it cheapens the deaths of the six million, who were murdered by the Nazis.
Jewish Critics of Israel Victims of Anti-Semitic Ultra-Zionist Smears
But this is precisely what the people behind the anti-Semitism smears are doing. And many of the people they smear are self-respecting Jews, who as critics of Israel can, like Shraga Stern, a Heredi supporter of Jeremy Corbyn, justly claim to have been victims of sectarian anti-Semitic abuse and vilification.
Conclusion
The Jewish organisations claiming to have been hurt by Labour anti-Semitism are liars, both about the incidence of anti-Semitism in the Labour party and their motives for denouncing it. They were protected and supported by a lying Labour party bureaucracy, and are now by a lying Labour leadership. And these smears were spread by a lying British political and media establishment terrified of a revived Labour party that would actually do something for working people. Who of course include Jews. Always have done, always will do, ever since it was founded.
‘Hurt’ nonsense! This is a nasty pack of lies that smears decent people, cheapens real victims of anti-Semitism and desensitizes people to the real anti-Semites in the Fascist fringe. How utterly, utterly contemptible!
Tags: 'I' Newspaper, Andrew Feinstein, anti-racism, anti-semitism, Anti-Semitism Smears, Archbishop of Canterbury, Boris Johnson, British Union of Fascists, Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, Christianity, Colonisation, Conservatives, Conspiracy Theories, Deaths, Diane Abbott, Establishment, Ethnic Cleansing, Gaza, Haredi Jews, Holocaust, Holocaust Survivors, International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Jacobsmates, Jeremy Corbyn, Jerusalem, Jewish Labour Movement, Jews, Just William, Labour Party, London, March of the Flags, Media, Media Bias, Norman Finkelstein, Orthodox Jews, Oswald Mosley, Palestinians, Paole Zion, racism, United Synagogue, Vox Political, Zionsim
November 2, 2020 at 8:33 pm |
Reblogged this on Tory Britain!.
November 2, 2020 at 9:12 pm |
How can any one group claim to be, or represent, ‘The Jewish community’ ? They can’t. Many Jews oppose Zionism and supported Jeremy Corbyn.
November 5, 2020 at 9:39 pm |
«a video this weekend showing very clearly that Corbyn wasn’t an anti-Semite.»
There is no need of that: despite every attempt to find something, if there was the slightest hint in the EHRC report that Corbyn is an antisemite or has condoned antisemitism, he would have been frog-marched out of Labour by Keir Starmer.
That Corbyn was suspended merely for pointing out that the EHRC report confirms that antisemitism in Labour is a much smaller issue than claimed means that the EHRC and Keir Starmer could not find, despite enormous investigative effort, the slightest excuse to expel him for substantive reasons.
The suspension for commenting about the EHRC report is in effect proof that he has been exonerated by the EHRC from any charges of antisemitism or supporting or tolerating it.
November 5, 2020 at 9:42 pm |
«Many Jews oppose Zionism and supported Jeremy Corbyn»
Those two positions are compatible, but divergent, as Jeremy Corbyn is a long standing and committed zionist, for decades a supporter of the right of Israel to exist and for israeli citizens to live in peace without terrorist attacks or threats of war. Even if he is opposed to the far-right policies of Likud and similar parties.
November 5, 2020 at 9:48 pm |
Surely Zionism is behind the relentless illegal expansion of Israeli territory into Palestinian land, the bulldozing of villages etc. which I’m sure Jeremy Corbyn did not condone.
November 5, 2020 at 11:48 pm
«Surely Zionism is behind the relentless illegal expansion of Israeli territory into Palestinian land»
I would consider that a huge misunderstanding, probably due to extreme lack of information about the topic. Perhaps this quote will help trigger the desire to acquire some basic information:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm141201/halltext/141201h0001.htm
«Andy McDonald (Middlesbrough) (Lab): My hon. Friend talks about Hamas’s charter, which refuses to recognise Israel, but the charter of Likud, the ruling party in the coalition, states: “The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river.” Is that not a fetter to progress on this issue?
Jeremy Corbyn: Absolutely. The Likud charter, which is not talked about too much by those who support the Government of Israel, says that in those very specific terms, and there has to be some recognition that the Prime Minister of Israel is a member of Likud and is in power because of Likud support.»
November 6, 2020 at 8:50 am
@ Blissex
Here’s some basic information I acquired:
•The 1999 Likud Party platform emphasizes the right of settlement.
“The Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza are the realization of Zionist values. Settlement of the land is a clear expression of the unassailable right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel and constitutes an important asset in the defense of the vital interests of the State of Israel. The Likud will continue to strengthen and develop these communities and will prevent their uprooting.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likud
November 6, 2020 at 11:30 am
«The 1999 Likud Party platform emphasizes the right of settlement.»
Indeed, that is a Likud Party platform, not that of all zionists. Perhaps it would help list the main types of anti-zionism:
* Turn the state of Israel into a non-confessional or pluri-confessional (like Lebanon) state. This is position of a minority of israelis and many palestinians.
* Replace the state of Israel with an islamic republic giving non-muslim israelis the status of “dhimmis”. This is the position of the government of Iran and Hamas.
* Replace the state of Israel with an islamic republic and expel its jewish residents. This is the position of a significant minority of palestinians.
Jeremy Corbyn as a zionist disagrees with all of these, just as he disagrees with the Likud far-right politics of a confessional one-state solution.
November 6, 2020 at 2:51 pm |
“…are the realization of Zionist values”