This is an interesting piece of archaeological news from Tuesday’s edition of the I for 1 September 2020. The article ‘Bronze Age people turned human thigh bone into musical instrument’ by Nina Massey reported that archaeologists from Bristol University had discovered the instrument buried with other fragments of bone and tusk and axes buried as grave goods with a man near Stonehenge. The article reads
Researchers have uncovered evidence of a Bronze Age tradition that saw human remains retained and curated as relics over several generations.
The findings indicate a tangible way of honouring and remembering individuals some 4,500 years ago, experts say.
Led by the University of Bristol and published in the journal Antiquity, the study used radio-carbon dating and CT scanning.
Lead author Dr Thomas Booth said: “Even in modern secular societies, human remains are seen as particularly powerful objects, and this seems to hold true for people of the Bronze Age. However, they treated and and interacted with the dead in ways which are inconceivably macabre to us today.
“After radiocarbon dating Bronze Age human remains alongside other material buried with them, we found many had been buried a significant time after the person had died, suggesting a tradition of retaining and curating human remains.”
He added: “People seem to have curated the remains of people who had lived within living or cultural memory, and who likely played an important role in their life or their communities, or with whom they had a well-defined relationship, whether that was direct family, a tradesperson, a friend or even an enemy.
In one example from Wiltshire, a human thigh bone, crafted into a musical instrument was included as grave goods with the burial of a man found near Stonehenge.
The carved and polished artefact was found with other items including axes, a bone plate and a tusk. Radio-carbon dating of the thigh bone suggests it belonged to someone this person had known.
Professor Joanna Bruck, principal investigator on the project, and visiting professor at the University of Bristol’s department of anthropology and archaeology, said: “Although fragments of human bone were included as grave goods, they were also kept in the homes of the living, buried under house floors and even placed on display.”
Dr Booth said: “This study really highlights the strangeness and perhaps the unknowable nature of the distant past from a present-day perspective.”
He is also quoted as saying, “Bronze Age people did not view human remains with the sense of horror or disgust that we might feel today.”
This is the first time I’ve read about human remains being turned into a musical instruments in ancient Britain, but I’m not surprised. There are many cultures all over the world that preserve the skulls of dead ancestors and enemies. They included the Mandan and other tribes in the US, some indigenous peoples of Papua New Guinea and the ancient Celts. There’s a carving from an ancient Celtic temple from southern Gaul of a monster, whose two front claws rest on severed heads. Around the statue are depressions carved into its base, possibly to hold the real thing. Nigel Barley in one of his books on death around the world notes that in the traditional culture of one of the Pacific peoples, the skeletons of dead relatives are handled and taken apart, so that their descendants can carry bits of it about of them as an act of respect and remembrance.
And there are also cultures that turn human remains into musical instruments. There’s the Chod ceremony in Tibetan Buddhism, in which the priests wear aprons made out of human skin and play drums made of human skulls and, I believe, flutes from bone. Something similar may well have been done here with this instrument.
The Stonehenge connection is interesting and possibly relevant. One of the theories about the standing stones is that they were originally put up as monuments to the ancestors in a process involving secondary burial. This followed the suggestion of a Madagascan archaeologist, who said that they reminded him of the practice among his people. There the remains are interred for a period after death while they decay. After a certain time, they’re taken out, prepared and then re-buried in another set of ceremonies during which a stone or a wooden pole is set up as a monument. It may well be that this instrument was created as part of such a burial rite.
Tags: 'I' Newspaper, Amerindians, Bristol University, Bronze Age, Buddhism, Celts, Gaul, Nigel Barlay, Nina Massey, Papua New Guinea, Religion, Stonehenge, Thomas Booth, Tibet, Universities, Wiltshire
Beastrabban\'s Weblog 
September 4, 2020 at 4:57 pm |
Adds a whole new meaning to the Rolling Stones’ nickname, “the Strolling Bones”. And if you can excuse my popular cultural references, I am also reminded of the tv character ‘Catweazle’, who referred to the telephone as a “telling-bone”! And also the final episode of The Prisoner with the song “Dem bones, dem bones, dem thigh bones”. As for Stonehenge, I think it had many different uses by different peoples over a long period of time, some of which were probably funerary and /or connected with ancestor worship/reverence, though I believe it was originally constructed as a Sun temple (as described by the psychic medium Grace Cooke in her book ‘The Light in Britain’). But if they’d had pianos in the Bronze Age then we know what the keys might have been made of.