
I got an email from the Labour Party, of which I am a member, the other day asking if I had any policy suggestions. They’ve been holding various policy reviews for a few months now since Keir Starmer took over as leadere, and have sent at least one of these appeals for suggestions before. I can think of two policies I could suggest, one very serious, the other rather more far-fetched.
The first would be an end to the privatisation of the NHS. No further contracts should be given to private hospitals or healthcare companies. No expansion of the number of charges that Tory legislation permits for NHS services. An absolute end to the Private Finance Initiative and the construction of NHS hospitals in partnership with private companies. No handover of doctors’ surgeries or NHS hospitals to private healthcare companies to manage. If people want to pay for their healthcare, fine, but the NHS should not under be sold off to private enterprise, for them to charge us for it as so many Tories, including Dido Harding’s husband, would like.
That’s the very serious one. The other one is a piece of utopian political theorising I wrote two years ago, and published with the print on demand company Lulu. I was furious with the corruption of parliament by corporate interests. It was reported that something like 77 per cent of MPs are millionaires, and that both Houses are packed with the owners and senior officers in private enterprise. Under the corporatism of the late 20th and early 21st century capitalist penetration of politics, private firms now grant donations to parties and individual politicos, and sponsor events and conferences. In return, senior staff and directors are taken on by government as advisors, or put in charge of government departments and committees. Legislation is framed not for the benefit of the community, but for big business. This has occurred not just under the parties of the right, like the Republicans in America and the Tories here in Britain, but also in the Democrats and the British Labour Party under Tony Blair. See George Monbiot’s excellent dissection of it and its consequences in Captive State, and Rory Bremner’s, John Bird’s and John Fortune’s You Are Here. The working class is being shut out of power, even in the very party that was founded to represent it.
For A Workers’ Chamber was my suggestion for combating this by setting up within parliament a separate chamber to represent working people, organised according to industry, and whose members would consist of workers from those industries. Not managers or directors, workers. I based it on arguments for a parliament for working people that had been around since the early Socialists and Chartists in the 19th century. The blurb for my book runs
For a Worker’s Chamber argues that a special representative chamber composed of representatives of the working class, elected by the working class, is necessary to counter the domination of parliament by millionaires and the heads of industries.
It (t)races the idea of worker’s special legislative assemblies from Robert Owen’s Grand Consolidated Trade Union, anarchism, syndicalism, Guild Socialism, the workers’, soldiers’ and peasants’ councils in Revolutionary Russia, Germany and Austria, the Utopian Socialism of Saint-Simon and the Corporativism of Fascist Italy. It also discusses the liberal forms of corporativism which emerged in Britain during the First and Second World Wars, as well as the system of workers’ control and producer’s chambers in Tito’s Yugoslavia.
It argues that parliamentary democracy should not be abandoned, but needs to be expanded to includ(e) a worker’s chamber to make it more representative.
Of course, such a chamber wouldn’t be necessary if we had a Labour Party that took its job seriously and actually stood for working people rather than corporate interests. There was hope with the election of Jeremy Corbyn, but that’s been severely damaged, if not destroyed completely in many people’s eyes with the election of Keir Starmer. Starmer’s a Blairite neoliberal, who appears to be reversing all the policies agreed and presented in Labour’s last election manifesto. It says so much about the corporate corruption of the party that the Groaniad announced without any shame whatsoever a few weeks ago that the corporate donors, who had stopped funding the party under Corbyn, were now returning under Starmer. Corbyn had transformed Labour into the largest socialist party in Europe, and had raised money not through corporate donations and sponsorship, like Blair, but through ordinary members’ subscriptions. Blair’s and Brown’s determination to cater to big business and turn to winning middle class votes actually lost them working class support, a portion of whom instead turned to UKIP.
And now this seems set to return under Starmer.
So, should I try to be a bit provocative and send my book and its demand for a special chamber of parliament for the workers to the Labour Party as a suggestion for their policy review?
Tags: Big Business, Captive State, Conservatives, Corporate Donors, Corporate State, Corporativism, Democrat Party, Dido Harding, George Monbiot, Gordon Brown, Grand Consolidated Trade Union, Guild Socialism, Jeremy Corbyn, John Bird, John Fortune, Keir Starmer, Labour Party, Lulu, Managing Directors, Marshal Tito, Middle Class, Millionaires, NHS, NHS Privatisation, Private Finance Initiative, Private Healthcare Companies, Republican Party, Robert Owen, Rory Bremner, Russian Revolution, Saint-Simon, Syndicalism, The Guardian, tony blair, You Are Here
September 3, 2020 at 6:33 pm |
Go ahead, I would. I just recently sent my MP (Lab) a pdf of Kate Belgrave’s book ‘Abuse of Power’, available free via a link on her blog, and which is about the experiences of the most vulnerable under the effects of Austerity and Welfare reforms. He emailed me thanking me for the recommendation.
September 3, 2020 at 7:18 pm |
Thanks, Trev. I hadn’t heard of the book, but it sounds like a very good and very necessary one.
September 3, 2020 at 7:21 pm
‘Abusing Power’ (not “Abuse of..”)
https://nx10568.your-storageshare.de/s/yBWAXAPRKyzG5RJ
September 3, 2020 at 7:44 pm |
My suggestion is that the second chamber to be based on job or work as par the national sensus. This would have to be restarted (no more guesses based on a small sensus). Each group would choose a representative and each representative would have a number of votes based on the size of each group. It would be illegal for the representatives to have any sponsorship outside the group (including any political party) but be paid well for attendance.
September 4, 2020 at 6:54 am |
Please Do and apparently FB won’t share this post as:
“Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.” !!!