Mike today put up a piece about the two candidates the government is considering sticking on the back of the fifty pound note. They are Alan Turing, the wartime mathematical genius, who broke the enigma code and helped shorten the war. One of the machines Turing designed, or helped design to break the code was programmable, and Turing is respected as one of the founders of modern computing.
He was, however, gay at a time when it was very much against the law. He was convicted of gross indecency, and chemically castrated, which led to him taking his own life.
Thatcher, on the other hand, is the woman whose policies have inflicted nothing but misery on this planet for nearly forty years. She started the Tories’ and New Labour’s privatization programme, including that of the NHS, the destruction of the welfare state and deliberately made signing on for unemployment benefit as humiliating as possible, in order to deter the poor from doing so. She was also determined to break the unions, manufacturing a strike by the NUM through the gutting of British coalmining, purely to break the union that had brought down Heath’s government years before. And she used the police has her army to attack and beat the miners, aided by a complicit media, including the Beeb. These ran the footage of the strike at Orgreave colliery backwards to make it appear that the miners were attacking the police, while it was the other way round.
Exactly as the great peeps on Twitter, whose comments Mike quotes in his piece about it.
Ah, but Thatcher was a chemist! She worked for Walls, inventing the process that injects air into ice cream to make it appear that there’s more of it than there is.
Well, if the government wants to put scientists, and especially women scientists, on the fifty pound note, I’ve got a few suggestions of my own. Female scientists they could choose include:
Dorothy Hodgkin. She’s the woman who should have got the prize for discovering the structure of DNA, as Crick and Watson were looking completely in the wrong direction until they walked past the door of her lab, and heard her talking about her work. She lost the Nobel to them, but did get another prize for another great discovery she made. If she hasn’t been already, it’s the right time to have her commemorated on our folding stuff.
Jocelyn Bell Purnell. She was the astronomer, who discovered pulsars. These are tiny, dense stars at the end of their lives, which send out a radio signal. They spin very quickly, so that the signal sweeps across the sky, so that they appear as a regular beat. At first it was believed that they might be signals from an extraterrestrial civilization. Some astronomers also believe that, while they’re natural, space-traveling aliens could use them as lighthouses to navigate their way across the Galaxy.
Helen Sharman. She’s another chemist, though at Mars, rather than Walls. But she is know for being the first Brit into space when she joined the British-Russian space mission to Mir in the 1980s. Since then, she’s been something of a science educator, appearing at events to encourage children to take up science.
Caroline Herschel. She’s the brother of John Herschel, and daughter of William. She and her brother were astronomers in 18th century Bath, making telescopes and discovering new stars.
I’m sure there are many others. These are all astronomy and space related, because that’s the area I’m interested in and know most about. All of these ladies have a better claim to be on the Fifty pound note than Thatcher.
But if you want another bloke, how about Dr. Jacob Bronowski. He was another mathematician working during the War. He was also the presenter of the 1970s Beeb science blockbuster, The Ascent of Man. He was also a Fabian socialist with a hatred of war. In The Ascent of Man he makes his view of armed conflict very clear by saying: ‘War is theft by other means’. It’s parody of Clausewitz’s famous phrase ‘War is politics by other means’. Bronowski’s description of war is very true, especially now when we’ve seen that the humanitarian interventions in the Middle East have all been about conquering them in order to despoil their oil reserves, loot their state industries and stop any kind of Arab and Islamic support for Israel. And Iran appears to be next on the hit list.
However, I do like the suggestion of Raab C. Brexit that it should be the sage of Govan, Rab C. Nesbitt on the notes. Having his mug staring out at them might just put a few of the really filthy rich off when they get it out to pay for their bottle of Krug.
Remember, it was Nesbitt who predicted that there’d be a war between the Toffs and the Scum. The Toffs would win initially, because they’ve got the army. But the Scum would be the victors, because they have all the Rottweilers.
See also Mike’s article at: https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2018/11/27/whose-face-do-you-want-on-the-back-of-the-50-note-alan-turing-or-margaret-thatcher/
Tags: Alan Turing, Aliens, Bath, BBC, Biology, Caroline Herschel, Chemistry, Children, Clausewitz, Computers, Conservatives, DNA, Dorothy Hodgkin, Enigma Code, Fabian Society, Francis Crick, Gays, Govan, Helen Sharman, Ice Cream, Jacob Bronowski, James Watson, Jocelyn Bell-Purnell, John Herschel, Margaret Thatcher, Middle East, miners' Strike, Mir, Money, New Labour, NHS Privatisation, Nobel Prize, NUM, Oil Industry, Orgreave Colliery, Police, Privatisation, Pulsars, Raab C. Brexit, Rab C. Nesbit, Space Travel, State Enterprises, Strikes, Suicide, The Ascent of Man, The Media, the Poor, Vox Political, War, Welfare State, William Herschel, World War II
November 27, 2018 at 7:39 pm |
Reblogged this on sdbast.
November 27, 2018 at 11:40 pm |
The Thatcher (and churchill viz andrew roberts’s radio 4 travesty) personality cultists will never give up!
Ada Lovelace seems a good choice.
November 28, 2018 at 8:50 am |
Is this the Radio 4 programme, ‘Great Lives’, where they get someone on to argue that a certain historical figure was truly great and worth commemorating? Some of those the programme’s featured have been definitely great, but Churchill’s a very problematic figure.
The YouTube feminist and anti-Fascist Kevin Logan put up a video recently attacking Prager University for their video going on about how great the British Empire was, which showed how the British Empire really was deeply nasty and exploitative. It covered things like the concentration camps in the Boer War and the various famines in India, engineered by the British. Churchill was mentioned, because the Bengal famine of 1944 was created by Churchill seizing their grain supplies in order to stockpile them for us. When he was told about the famine, he ranted about how useless and undeserving the Indians were, and that it was their fault for having too many children. Given his comments, you really can see why they wanted independence.