Facebook has been accused recently of censorship and pulling down masses of left-wing and alternative sites. In this video, RT America reports on Facebook’s censorship of a film by Groaniad columnist, George Monbiot for Double Down Media, on the crimes of the British Empire and Columbus’ genocide of the Amerindians. RT’s reporter states that it disproved the claim that the West’s conquests were less barbaric than others.
This is then followed by a piece from movie, in which Monbiot explains that before Columbus landed in the New World, there were 100 million native Americans. By the 19th century, there were less than one million. It was a policy deliberately endorsed by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, who wrote of the necessity of wiping out Native American peoples.
There then follows a Tweet from Double Down News reporting how Facebook had taken down the movie for ‘violating community standards’. The company states that it was a work of serious journalism which had gather 1 million views. The company was given no right of appeal or any reason for censorship. Why, they ask, is Facebook censoring history?
This came after Facebook took 800 pages they claimed were posting spam. They also used that excuse to pull down other alternative sites, like police watchdog groups and a fan page for RT correspondent Rachel Blevins. Monbiot himself tweeted that he thought the company’s banning of the Columbus film was a one-off, but now it appears to be part of a purge of dissenting posts.
The piece’s host then turns to interview George Galloway in London, asking him if this latest act of censorship by Facebook will lead to more people paying attention to the story.
Galloway replies that it sounds like a great video, and that he’ll try and see if he can go and see it somewhere, observing that the book they try to ban always goes to the top of the bestseller lists. Hopefully this will backfire on Facebook. He goes on to say that he himself has about a million and a half followers on social media, and because he is so well-known, he always thought he’d be invulnerable to this kind of thing. But George Monbiot is a very famous journalist and something of an insider in the British establishment, and now it’s happened to him. He states that it is quite intolerable that Facebook, a private company, can take an anti-commercial decision – which it is, if the movie had a million views – based on the political view of censoring history. And he states that he’s always known that British imperial history is censored from schooldays onward. We’re taught all about the crimes of Hitler and Stalin, but never about the crimes of imperialism.
The programme’s presenter states that there is an irony there, as Monbiot’s film touched on the way that history has been censored, and then Facebook does it all over again. Galloway replies that some of this censorship will be accidents, performed by some machine or factotum somewhere striking down something that casts an unfortunate light on the proprietors. It may be reinstated. But the general pattern seems to be that Facebook has become an adjunct of the Deep State in Britain, the United States and elsewhere, and that Deep State is bent on suppressing dissident views. This should open up a space for capitalism to work, of it works as it’s claimed to, for new Facebooks to come online, because after all it’s just a noticeboard. He hopes that the laws of commercial reality will reassert themselves. And people will know that if there’s a million views for Monbiot’s video, that’s a market not just an audience, and we’ll have to wait and see what emerges.
The host then goes on to ask him to talk about the crimes of western civilization and the British Empire which he thinks are overlooked. Galloway responds by saying the one she’s just discussed, about the massacre of nearly 100 million native Americans, is fairly hard to beat. ‘That is a Holocaust with a double capital ‘H”. But, he continues, the British Empire was committing crimes well into his own lifetime. We were shooting down Yemenis in Aden in the Crater(?) district when the Beatles were No. 1; we were shooting down Irish people on the streets of the Six Counties in the North of Ireland when the Beatles had been gone for several years. British imperial crimes are almost without number. He quotes his Irish grandfather as saying that the sun never set on the British Empire as God would never trust them in the dark. He goes on to say that the crimes of the British Empire continue to this day, in Yemen and Syria. Galloway describes the Kenyan examples, which Monbiot discusses in his film, as ‘quite extraordinary’. In Kenya and Malaya we were paying British servicemen a bounty for coming in with the heads of rebels, who were fighting for their own countries’ freedom from the British Empire. ‘And they talk about savages’.
It’s astonishing that Facebook should censor Monbiot’s video. I haven’t seen it, and don’t know anything about it except what is said here. But it seems to be well-established, uncontroversial fact. Columbus’ landing in the Americas did lead to the genocide of the Native American peoples. This was through exposure to European diseases, to which they had no immunity, enslavement and being worked to death. And what Columbus and the Spanish did the indigenous peoples of the Caribbean is truly horrific. They were worked to death producing gold. If they didn’t produce enough, they were mutilated. Their hands were cut off and hung round their necks. Indigenous women were raped by the conquistadors, and beaten if they didn’t show themselves to be sufficiently enthusiastic about pleasing their masters. Quite apart from the murder of their priests and aristocracy as pagans.
As for what the British did in Kenya, that can be read about in books like Africa’s Secret Gulags, amongst other books. I’ve posted reviews here from Lobster of more recent books discussing more recent British covert actions aimed at subverting nationalist movements and the democratic process in the former British colonies.
Facebook’s censorship of dissident and oppositional pages is a threat to the new freedoms of information that the internet has brought. Alternative news shows like Sam Seder’s Majority Report are discussing the possibility that the Net should be brought into government ownership in order to preserve it from interference and censorship by private corporations. I’m not sure this would do much good, as it would leave the American government able to censor it, in the same way that Blair, Sarkozy and Berlusconi used their power to censor and control information and news on state television. But I don’t think there can be much doubt now that Facebook and other big internet corporations are censoring news very much in concert with the demands of the Conservative elite and Deep State.
Tags: 'Africa's Secret Gulags', 'Free Speech, Aden, Adolf Hitler, African Nationalism, Amerindians, Berlusconi, British Empire, Capitalism, Censorship, Christopher Columbus, Colonialism, Conquistadors, Covert Operations, Deep States, Double Down News, Facebook, Genocide, George Galloway, George Monbiot, George Washington, Gold, Imperialism, Lobster, London, Massacres, Mutilation, Nationalisation, Nicholas Sarkozy, Pagans, Private Industry, Rachel Blevins, Rape, RT America, Sam Seder's Majority Report, stalin, the Beatles, The Guardian, Thomas Jefferson, tony blair, Women
October 28, 2018 at 8:12 am |
Hi Beastie,
Hope you are recovering OK?
It is odd to see Monbiot write openly on past imperialism in the America’s and be so closed to critical examination of the official narrative re Syria.
In November 2015, Francis Sealey and I held a meeting at the House of Commons on the ‘Ethics of the Arms Trade – Britain’s Role’
House of Commons Meeting – Ethics & The Arms Trade – Britain’s Role.
Wednesday, Nov 18, 2015, 6:30 PM
Location details are available to members only.
72 21st Century Networkers Went
Join us at this House of Commons Meeting where we look at Britain, the Arms Trade and Human Rights abuse.Norman Lamb MP has agreed to host a meeting in the House of Commons on Ethics & The Arms Trade – Britain’s Role.The arms trade is a major cause of human rights abuses. Some governments spend more on military expenditure than on social develop…
Check out this Meetup →
At that time we were made well aware of the psychological pressure bearing down on MP’s re more bombing of Syria – i.e. to tow the line and also not to go ahead with this discussion, but we did.
So it is rather odd that Monbiot threw away his skepticism re the narrative to justify more bombing. Just an FYI for you Beastie on others critical of the Syrian scenario.:
https://timhayward.wordpress.com/2018/01/12/the-guardian-white-helmets-and-silenced-comment/
https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2017-04-28/a-disavowal-from-monbiots-witch-hunt/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/11/22/monb-n22.html
https://off-guardian.org/2018/04/13/how-we-were-misled-about-syria-george-monbiot-of-the-guardian/
Critics of the official narrative were prudent to be cautious, for example, the Dutch Cabinet and Foreign Office stopped all monies in September 2018 to Syria and the White Helmets because they people receiving it were unvetted as well as the pickup points:
https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/nederland-stopt-steun-aan-syrische-oppositie-wegens-gebrekkig-toezicht-op-hulpprojecten-britse-organisatie-ontkent-kritiek-~bda7b84e/
Sorry it is Dutch, here is a bit of pertinent info I translated from the article for some of the writers in the links above: “The Dutch foreign office report also said most of the local Syrian agents had never been given background checks & when the money was sent to Syria they used a risky ‘informal’ banking system, because there were no records or checks that the money went to the correct people.”
REF: https://twitter.com/Michellestwitr/status/1040986508856119297
A reminder to us to check all interpreters of our current madness, no matter how esteemed they seem to be!
Strength to you Beastie.