Is This the Real Reason for the Tories’ Gagging Laws?

Cameron Pic

Nick Clegg

David Cameron and Nick Clegg: have attempted to regulate and clamp down on free speech and democratic criticism.

The Coalition has shown itself to be consistently opposed to free speech. Mike over at Vox Political, the Void, Another Angry Voice, and Tom Pride at Pride’s Purge have blogged on the way the Conservatives are attempting to stifle dissent and criticism through the Gagging Laws and other legislation. The act regulating political lobbying would make political campaigning by groups, which are not political parties illegal, while allowing the big corporations that lobby MPs to carry on as usual.

They have attempted to censor the internet, with the full backing of the outraged, Middle class authoritarians of the Daily Mail, on the pretence of protecting children and the vulnerable from accessing pornography and the other horrors out on the Net. This frightened and outraged the Neo-Pagans, ritual magicians and other occultists, who found that one of the subjects the Coalition wanted to restrict access to was ‘the esoteric’. This is a term frequently used to describe the occult. Here it probably means something like ‘weird stuff we don’t like, but haven’t thought of yet’, though as the late Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickinson was utterly convinced that there were intergenerational groups of witches and Satanists abusing and sacrificing children, it may well indeed have been intended to attack contemporary occultism.

Tom Pride in particular has found himself the victim of such legislation, after his blog was censored by one internet provider because it contained ‘adult material’. Politics are adult business, and so this is an attack, not just on Mr Pride, but on the continued discussion of politics on the Net.

And a few days ago Mike over at Vox Political described how Britain had fallen from 29th to 33rd place in the index of international press freedom through the government’s persecution of the Guardian for publishing the revelations of mass surveillance by the British and American intelligence services by Edward Snowden.

Clearly, the Coalition is desperately afraid of free speech.

Adolf Hitler

Adolf Hitler: Private Industry needs dictatorship to defend it from democracy.

In his address to a group of 20 German industrialists on 20th February 1933, Hitler urged them to fund the Nazi party as a way of protecting private enterprise from the threat of democracy.

Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy; it is conceivable only if the people have a sound idea of authority and personality. Everything positive, good and valuable, which has been achieved in the world in the field of economics and culture, is solely attributable to the importance of personality. When, however, the defence of the existing order, its political administration, is left to a majority, it will go under irretrievably. All the worldly goods which we possess we owe to the struggle of the chosen. Had we the present conditions in the Middle Ages, the foundations of our German Reich would never have been laid. The same mentality that was the basis for obtaining these values must be used to preserve these values… It is, however, not enough to say: We do not Communism in our economy. If we continue on our old political course, then we shall perish. We have fully experienced in the past years that economics and politics cannot be separated. The political conduct of the struggle is the primary, decisive factor. Therefore, politically clear conditions must be reached…

Cameron and Clegg also lead an elite government, composed of aristocrats, with the express purpose of defending private industry from state interference, and extending it into areas previous considered to be that of the state. Nazi Germany had a dirigiste, centrally-planned economy, though one which preserved and operated through private, rather than state-owned industry as in the Soviet Union. Cameron and Clegg have also showed themselves eager to suppress free speech and democratic political campaigning by groups outside the parties. Is this because they similarly share Hitler’s fear that

‘Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy’, but only if the people are led by a strong, dictatorial personality, like a Right-wing, authoritarian Prime Minister and his deputy?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Is This the Real Reason for the Tories’ Gagging Laws?”

  1. pippakin Says:

    Reblogged this on Political Pip Spit or Swallow its up to You and commented:
    I totally agree with the spirit of a free world wide internet completely agree with it, but as someone who knows what its like to be a victim of what I suppose I may as well call internet thugs, although from what I’ve seen of them and I’ve made it my business to see a great deal of my abusers, anything less thuggish looking than some of them is hard to imagine. And that’s the very thing of it! Internet thugs can be the poor devil who suffered abuse for years and now finds himself in the luxurious position of being able to hurt others anonymously…The internet is a wonderful and terrifying thing which as technology improves needs to be properly self policed by us all or all of us not just the ‘thugs’ will be paying the price. The thugs time is virtually up.

  2. Mike Sivier Says:

    Reblogged this on Vox Political.

  3. A6er Says:

    Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.

  4. The Swans New Party Says:

    The Holocaust in 1930s Nazi Germany onto into the war years, included German on German death clinics.

    The elderly in nursing homes were starved to death on purpose.

    The disabled of all ages, including babies and children, were gathered up and also starved to death.

    It was the Catholic church and its congregation who, in the end, ended these death clinics.

    The Nazis called the elderly and disabled as ‘wasteful eaters’.

    NICE recent guidelines say not to waste treatment and medication on those beyond working age and only to focus on those who will work.

    Euthanasia aka DNR aka Liverpool Care Pathway in the UK has been able to undertake Institutionalised Homicide by case law since 1999 that permitted it upon the non-dying. Medicine has no solid scientific way of saying who will die or not.

    The unemployed, sick, disabled, people over 60 – are all being targeted to be left hungry, frozen and penniless in UK today.

    I lezae youkind reader to see the similarities.
    http://www.theswansnewparty.org.uk

  5. rainbowwarriorlizzie Says:

    Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & THE SIEGE OF BRITAIN POLITICAL JOURNAL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: